When 42% Is Not Just 42%: How a Poll Becomes a Political Rorschach Test

Reading Time: 6 minutesSeries: “Election Forecasting: Between Statistics, Politics, and Uncertainty” — Election Forensics This post continues my series on election forecasting, written for both specialists and readers who do not spend their evenings thinking about sampling frames, turnout models, and predictive distributions. I am currently preparing a…

Why 3.1% May Matter More Than 40%: The Uncertainty Behind Election Forecasts

Reading Time: 10 minutesSeries: “Election Forecasting: Between Statistics, Politics, and Uncertainty” — Election Forensics When a percentage looks more precise than it really is Imagine two television programmes discussing the forthcoming parliamentary election. On the first, an analyst confidently announces that List A will receive 41% of the…

Polls Are Not Crystal Balls: Why 41%, 42%, 39%, and 40% May All Be Right

Reading Time: 10 minutesSeries: “Election Forecasting: Between Statistics, Politics, and Uncertainty” — Election Forensics A new series: less fortune-telling, more understanding How many votes will Serbia's Student List win? How much support will the electoral list led by Aleksandar Vučić attract? Which parties will cross the electoral threshold,…

Sentimental Education in Serbia: How Media Sentiment Shapes the Electoral Terrain

Reading Time: 5 minutesIntroduction: why sentiment belongs to election forensics Election forensics is often associated with numbers: turnout, vote shares, invalid ballots, polling-station anomalies, unusual statistical patterns or inconsistencies between official databases and polling-station records. These are essential elements of electoral verification. However, election results are not produced…